"I am writing to inform you of a recent conflagration of events and occurrences that may have widespread implications for global M&A activity into the near future. Given recent corporate proclivity to hold excess cash ($1.84 trillion in cash and marketable securities on non-financial corporate balance sheets) and worldwide investors insatiable demand for bonds it seems many companies, especially those under pressure to deliver results to shareholders, will derive lofty valuations for firms they seek to acquire.
As evidence for the insatiable demand of bonds, I will present the results of two recent debt offerings, one by McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD), and another by Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC). Late this July, MCD issued $450mil of 10-year notes and $300mil of 30-year bonds. The 10-year notes were issued with a yield of 3.5%, matching the lowest 10-year rate for all US issuers in 15 years, the 30-year notes (issued at 4.875%) matched an all-time low mark set recently by Wal-Mart. In addition, NSC recently issued what has been termed “century” bonds. These bonds, as the name indicates, will not pay back their principal until 2110, a time at which (likely) all current purchasers will have ceased to be living. NSC initially planned to sell only $100mil of these bonds, but prior to announcing the quantity of the deal, investors expressed interest in at least $75mil, the issuance was then raised to $250mil and was still oversubscribed. This oversubscription and the competitive bidding process for the paper led to the bonds selling above par (6%), and with a yield-to-maturity of 5.95%. While very few assets can have a lifespan of 100 years and thus will not be able to match the lifespan of the liability, I will offer a short defense of the century bond. If (and this will likely not be the case) the coming hundred years is analogous to the last hundred years, the present value of the $250mil principal payment in 2110 is currently nominally worth approximately $13mil, which is $2mil less than the real annual coupon payment.
This ability to acquire cheap cash could lead to an expansion of worldwide M&A deals. While above I state this cheap cash will lead to expensive acquisitions, I believe this has already begun and should serve as a cautionary tale to executives thinking about expanding through acquisitions. Recently, there have been three large acquisitions or attempted acquisitions that have occurred. Intel recently acquired McAfee virus protection in an all-cash deal and publicly stated the deal “will not significantly contribute to next year’s income”, seemingly fitting the bill of an expensive acquisition. Additionally, HP and Dell are currently locked in a bidding war for the data storage company 3Par, with the most recent bid nearly double the initial offer. And this acquisition spree is not limited to tech firms, with Australian mining giant BHP Billiton having recently taken a $130/share offer directly to the shareholders in an attempt to win control of the Canadian fertilizer miner Potash of Saskatchewan, this $130/share offer has been rejected by management as being too low and the company is currently searching for a “white knight” with several sovereign wealth funds being considered as potential bidders in addition to BHP. Companies that may or may not be on the prowl for acquisitions in the near future include Apple and Cisco, both with net cash positions of at least $25bil."
I wrote the memo about two weeks ago and some changes have already taken place, just a couple days ago Cisco announced they would be returning some of their large cash pool to shareholders through a dividend. Of the two main methods of returning capital to shareholders, dividends are the method I least like, but it's a good start and that's a discussion for another day. If you (my reader, singular) have any questions about that writing, or any other questions about classes here at Walton, let me know, I do take blog requests. Also, sometime on the horizon, I'll be having a guest blogger (the Czar) do a post for a little different perspective on the program.
What can you tell me about Garmin futures? Should I buy or hold out?
ReplyDeletewhere are you doing your mba, what are your thoughts on the mba courses in london in comparison to those in the US?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Ehram, I am currently completing my MBA at the University of Arkansas, Sam Walton College of Business. While I do not have direct, first-hand knowledge of any MBA programs in the UK I will attempt to put forth what I believe sets a Walton MBA apart from all schools. And I will try not to sound arrogant when I say this, but a key difference between a Walton MBA and any other MBA program anywhere is our proximity to a Fortune 1 company. As the name implies, there is only one Fortune 1 company, and we're the closest top-flight school. This proximity affords us select few in the program the opportunity not only to interact with them, but also to take advantage of all the resources they have drawn to the area. Just this morning I walked into my marketing research class (a few minutes late to my embarassment) and speaking to the class was Bob Seelert, the Worldwide Chairman of Saatchi and Saatchi. And I can honestly say that was not a random occurance, just yesterday evening I had a thirty minute long conversation with a VP of Category Management for Micheal's (North America's largest crafts and hobbies company).
ReplyDeleteWal-Mart (the afforementioned Fortune 1 company) has drawn to the area every vendor they deal with, I know they (Wal-Mart) have a permanent contingent of Deloitte people here (I know there is a PWC and E&Y office in the area, not sure about KPMG), and they have a very active International M&A department (I know this because they employ a former Walton MBA grad). All of that is to say that while the area is dominated by a single company, we are not limited in our employment options either by the employer whom we wish to work for or what line of work we wish to follow. As an analogy, Wal-Mart's $400+billion in revenues puts them on par with the economies of Ohio, New Jersey, and Belgium (they're actually slightly larger than Belgium), something that large has to be diverse.
Another competitive advantage of the Walton MBA is our entrepreneurial track record. Last year we were listed as the #7 most competitive MBA program in the country, and that was before we swept nearly all top prizes at Moot Corp (the "Super Bowl", or "FA Cup" if more to your liking, of business plan competitions) and a host of other business plan competitions. In addition to the cash prizes, two new businesses have been formed out of last years entrepreneurship track, which is quite amazing for a program of our size. With regards to our size, being a small program ( < style="mso-spacerun: yes"> While I do not begrudge people for going to Harvard (they're obviously a great school with an exceptional track record), with near 2,000 full-time MBA students, I don't think I would be afforded the firsthand opportunities I have had here in Arkansas.